Wal-Mart
has been known for its issues concerning the wellbeing of its workers.
Recently, Wal-Mart’s low wages have received much attention in all forms of
media, including political cartoons. Steve Sack joined the protest by drawing a
political cartoon juxtaposing a Wal-Mart employee with two impoverished people.
Standing beside a road with their palms outstretched, the three characters hold
signs that say “Broke”, “Homeless”, and “On my break—work at Wal-Mart”.
While the first
two signs describe very unfortunate situations that put someone at the bottom
of society, the third seems ridiculous. Someone who is employed should be
capable of finding a place to live and having some amount of money set aside,
and yet, as this cartoon asserts, Wal-Mart has not met these expectations.
Though the message would have been clear had the employee’s sign read “Work at
Wal-Mart”, Sack adds the fact that he is on his break to show how Wal-Mart has
not only stripped its employees of necessary pay, but also of their leisurely
time. Both of these criticisms of Wal-Mart support the author’s argument that
Wal-Mart’s policies are unjust and need reform. His purpose would therefore be
bringing attention to this issue so that people will act on it.
This cartoon was published right
before Thanksgiving, and more importantly Black Friday, which has now managed
to seep into Thursday thanks to corporations like Wal-Mart. The attention to
Wal-Mart as a result of their earlier opening time lends to the effectiveness
of this cartoon, since it is especially relevant during this time. Sack’s
audience, which is made up of readers of the Minnesota-based Star Tribune, probably came across his
cartoon while reading local news. Therefore, their views may not be as radical
or strong as someone who searches for political commentaries. This probably
benefits Sack, as those who are indifferent are more easily persuaded to accept
a point of view. Sack won a Pulitzer Prize in 2013 for his editorial cartoons, and
has been drawing them since 1981. Given how simply and clearly Sack’s perspective
is argued, along with the ideal context of the cartoon and Sack’s moderate audience,
I believe his purpose was achieved.
No comments:
Post a Comment